««Jun 2011»»

Search Box


cbt and mindfulness

Mailing List

RSS Feeds



All content within Anxiety Insights is provided for general information only, and should not be treated as a substitute for the medical advice of your doctor or other health care professional.

Anxiety Insights is not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a reader based on the content of this website.

Anxiety Insights is not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of the sites.

Always consult your doctor if you are in any way concerned about your health.

Recommended links

Depression is Real's Down & Up Show
Weekly audio-casts from the Depression Is Real Coalition

Teen Drug Abuse Intervention
Help fight teen drug abuse, we provide information to help fight teen drug abuse by prevention and intervention.

we support - micro loans that change lives

Moving a Nation to Care : Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and America's Returning Troops, by Ilona Meagher

No Longer

"just don't smoke"

"Don't smoke, whatever you do, just don't smoke."
                        Yul Brynner

Hit Counter

Total: 5,358,409
since: 14 May 2006

FDA considers classification of ECT

posted Wednesday, 23 December 2009

Psychiatry Weekly 2009 Dec 21;4(30)

Lisanby SH.

Professor of Clincal Psychiatry; Director of the Brain Stimulation Division, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute


With the increasing number of new brain stimulation techniques now available and on the horizon, does electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) still have a role? As a clinician and researcher, my reply is a definitive "yes." Some recent and unexpected developments at the FDA concerning the classification of medical devices may, however, affect the availability of ECT to severely depressed patients.

History of ECT Classification

Codified in 1938, the FDA is nearly as old as ECT. The FDA was codified with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act during the same year that Cerletti and Bini introduced ECT in Italy (though Meduna introduced chemoconvulsive therapy two years prior). When the Medical Device Amendments were introduced in 1976, ECT devices were already on the market in the US. They are thus considered "pre-amendment" devices, meaning they did not go through the premarket approval application (PMA) route that devices introduced after 1976 are required to go through today.


© 2009 Psychiatry Weekly, LLC


links: digg this    technorati    reddit